D'Ecosse said:
there is no reason to interpret Hrant's statement as being a contradiction to your's, as opposed to a supplement.
Sure there is. If Hrant intended his statement as a supplement, rather than a contradiction, he could have easily said, "This statement
would not be accurate if it were extended to all aftermarket mats" (using the conditional tense). But he didn't. Instead, he said, "This statement
is not accurate ..." implying that the statement was inaccurate as written. Which it was not.
D'Ecosse said:
There is no suggestion that your statement is wrong
Yes, there is. See above.
D'Ecosse said:
his merely indicates that "not all" after-market mats are configured as-such.
But he didn't say that not all aftermarket mats are configured as such. He said that my statement is not accurate. Which it is. So let's get real, Ken - don't claim that Hrant said something different, when everyone can see what he said.
D'Ecosse said:
Incidentally, I think Hrant does an admirable job of keeping his business interests in check with regard to this medium.
That's your opinion. I was mostly kidding when I made that reference in my original post (hence the smilie). However, as I see it, this topic is (or, was) not about floor mats, but about a particular car - and somehow a link to the sales website for the floor mats Hrant sells just happened to somehow get posted by Hrant. You can draw your own conclusions.
Perhaps now we can get back to the discussion of the '92 black/black NSX which this topic was originally about?