this is what I found http://cars.ign.com/articles/384/384725p1.html
I will take the engine and put it in the current NSX...
I will take the engine and put it in the current NSX...
Originally posted by BITeR:
VTEC did not first appear in the NSX.
CRX got it first.
Originally posted by BITeR:
The NSX was designed to have a non-VTEC engine and actually had to be enlongated a bit to fit the VTEC engine.
Originally posted by nsxtasy:
I don't think that's true either. The NSX body and the VTEC engine were developed together right from the start.
B]
Originally posted by Zuerst:
And if I'm not mistaken, the NSX was elongated because Honda (or some other executive) was a serious golf player and wants to make sure that a golf bag fits in the trunk...
Originally posted by nsxtasy:
When the car was introduced, it was claimed that two golf bags would fit.
I am not a golfer so I have not verified this.
Originally posted by Zuerst:
And if I'm not mistaken, the NSX was elongated because Honda (or some other executive) was a serious golf player and wants to make sure that a golf bag fits in the trunk...
I have the game grand turismo concept mentioned on the site and dnx is damn far and good in handling
Originally posted by Jimbo:
I do remember reading that the first test NSX mules had non-VTEC and SOHC heads and were essentially V6s from the Legend. I also seem to remember that the engine compartment of the production car was slightly expanded from those first prototypes. I'd have to dig them out.
Interestingly, the engine, which is different from the V-6 we drove last year, accounts for the one significant dimensional change between the production car and the prototype: A 1.2-in. wheelbase stretch and an increase in overall length from 169.9 to 173.4 in. were required for packaging.