Compare your NSX to your next favorite car that you have owned or own.

Joined
26 February 2007
Messages
10,180
Location
37°22′17″N 122°8′15″W
NSXRX7_2.jpg

NSXRX7_1.jpg


Powertrain: The FD’s powerband is more flat. The NSX is more linear. I prefer a more flat power band. HP and TQ comes on early in the FD at 2k RPMs when the first turbo kicks in. This is a turbo system that is suited for everyday usage for both stop and go city driving as well as freeway flying. Both cars have nice sounding engines and exhaust notes. The FD sounds more like a Turbine with all the turbos spooling and rotory engine. The NSX has a more exotic (with the right exhaust system) note with the engine behind the driver/passenger and the pulses. FD powerplant’s have a soft spot for poor tuning, low octane combination that may warrant trips for a rebuild. The NSX is reliable, but $ to HP ratio makes the FD (or just about any turbo’d cars) shine better. Advantage FD

Drivetrain: I’ve always been impressed with Honda’s tranny. Easy to use and reliable. The NSX’s shifter is shorter than the FD. The FD tends to stick when the tranny is heat soaked. Advantage NSX.

Handling & Braking: FD stops shorter and quicker. Since the front can except larger tires than the NSX and the FD has more of a 50/50 weight distribution, it does a good job in not only stopping in a straight line, but on turns as well. The FD’s steering is superb. It’s just so responsive and feels like a go-cart or a shark turning on its meal. Advantage FD.

Chassis: Both cars have stiff chassis. The FD seems to be a little stiffer. The FD is a lighter chassis and does with less expensive steel. FD is offered with a sunroof whereas the NSX has a targa as an option. Sunroof retains the chassis rigidness, the portal is on demand with a push of the button. The tilt up angle is purported to offer some degree of downforce. Targa offers more open space but requires the more manual work for removal and installation. FD's Cd is rated between .29 and .31 whereas the NSX is rated at .32Cd. Advantage FD.

Build quality & fit/finish: NSX executes a very well balance of luxury and sports in one package. It has more sound deadening than the FD. Advantage NSX

Ingress/Egress: The FD is easier since it’s not as low and the door sill is narrower. Advantage FD.

Seating/Ergonomics: I like the NSX seats better for 2 reasons. It’s larger and there are shoulder supports. Advantage NSX
NSX has more room at the dash, but the FD has more head room. FD has more leg room for the driver’s side yet the NSX is better for the passenger side. The FD’s center console is tilted towards the driver. Even the arm rest is directed towards the driver, while the NSX displays no bias. The FD’s arm rest is wider than the NSX. TIE

Instrument panel & Visibility: I’ve always liked cars that have the Tach in the middle. Nice and large. The FD is no exception. The oil and temp gauges are a little larger. What I didn’t like about the NSX is that the tach and speed are equal in size and side by side. The smaller gauges are spread equally on both sides. My eyes have to swing back and forth to get a quick vital stats. I like the important stuff to start in the center, like the FD’s tach and then the smaller gauges like oil, temp to be located in a group either left or right of the tach. Advantage FD.
The FD executes this well. Both cars have very similar visibility. The NSX is better in the front, but the FD is better in the rear. TIE

Climate Control: FD has none. Not only does the NSX have one; it’s very easy to use and accurate. Advantage NSX.

Sound System: Both have decent Bose system. The Bass on the FD sounds deeper, but the NSX sounds tighter. TIE

Storage: The NSX trunk is deeper and wider. The FD is longer from front to back and the divider can be removed to use the space in the cockpit. In the cockpit the FD has a driver’s side storage on the door and 2 bins behind both seats. The NSX has neither, but does have storage in the armrest that is notably larger than the FD’s driver side bin. Advantage FD.

Fuel Economy: FD gets low 20’s on the freeway cruising without boosting, which is about the same as my NSX in stop and go driving. NSX gets mid – high 20’s on the freeway. Advantage NSX.

Modification economics: Advantage FD.

Sex appeal: This parts subjective. I like the FD’s face the best and it’s organic lines which seems timeless (people often think it’s a few years old). I like the NSX rear-mid-engine shape. The car is wider and lower. Rear end is more muscular looking. NSX looks more like an Italian Exotic, where the FD is more like a Vette or Viper. Advantage NSX


NSXRX7_4.jpg

NSXRX7_3.jpg
 
Last edited:
My other favorite "car"?
That's easy. My Defender 90.
Why? It's just badass. :cool:
<img src="http://www.nsxprime.com/photopost/data/500/d902.jpg">
<img src="http://www.nsxprime.com/photopost/data/500/d90.jpg">
 
Last edited:
I dont have any pics handy but of all the other sports cars ive owned the only one i think is in the NSX's class would be my old 94 TT Supra. Im sure im not the only guy here who has owned both cars but they are both Japanese dream cars and it makes me miss the good old days of the 1990's.

The NSX has the Beauty of a mid engine design and the flat handling like nothing else ive driven but the Supra i owned would simply out run anything i ever came up against.

I loved owning the Supra when the new LS1's first came out. I would see them everywhere. They were all so proud until they met me and i made them look like they were standing still. I still remember my standard issue remark after words .... "did you miss a gear or something?" Knowing that most every Vette i toasted was an auto.

Now in my NSX im usually the one getting toasted but i simply dont play that game much anymore and prefer to let my cars looks to do the talking for it.

If the Supra wasnt so damn ugly id love to own another one because i really do feel that it is better suited as a daily than my NSX is. I have heard of people swapping Supra motors in SC Lexus' but unless i knew of someone local who i could trust to stay in business for the duration of ownership i doubt i would ever go that route.

Coming in at a distant third would be my 300zx TT. I bought the car thinking that the prevous owner was the one taking a bath on it because of all the upgrades he had done to the car (nearly the entire stillen cataloge). But it ended up being a money pit for me as well and after i had two different Nissan dealerships tell me that they wouldnt work on the car anymore i decided it was time to sell it. I raced my first NSX in my 300 though and that was the fondest memory i have of owning it.
 
It's a no-brainer: my 1974 DeTomaso Pantera L, chassis #6152

Probably the most solid, reliable automobile I've ever owned (only had the NSX 3 months, so it's yet to prove itself in that department).

The Pantera is a heavier car than the NSX, but the extra torque on the low end helps make up for that. After driving it for a few months, I found myself pleasantly surprised with the build quality. The doors shut firmly, the gaps were all consistent and interior material quality was good. I never experienced so much as a single rattle or squeak in that car in the 10 years I owned it. The NSX build quality is great also, but I seem to be constantly hunting down little rattles and odd noises. That annoys me.

The first 70 Panteras were essentially hand built, with each one being slightly different than the rest, but after those early cars, construction switched to an assembly line with much more automation and quality improved greatly.

As for handling & performance, the NSX wins easily. The Pantera had a heavier rear weight bias and was prone to understeer, but it was also a very forgiving car. If the rear end ever did break loose coming around a sweeper, it was easy to correct as long as you kept your foot in it. The NSX is much more agile and neutral, and overall more enjoyable on long drives. The big 351 Cleveland in the 'tera would really make itself known around 3500+ rpm as it hit the sweet spot on the power band, but would just about make a person deaf as it approached redline. It was an angry engine that didn't like high revs, quite the polar opposite of the VTEC.

For anyone considering a Pantera, do your homework and buy a rust-free example and you'll be happy. Inexpensive American V8 maintenance + eye-popping Italian lines. What's not to love?

:biggrin:
 

Attachments

  • pan8.jpg
    pan8.jpg
    39.5 KB · Views: 156
Recently I'm rollin' with two NSX's:biggrin: SC'd 92 or a bone stock 05, tough call:biggrin:
 
I can’t compare my cars I feel each one has such a different spirit, that’s why I have each, Its like having a different girl every night. Sure one out handle another and one sure has more power than the other, but I like each for what thay are and for what the manufacture was trying to market. I just love all cars but most of all I love the stories that go with each one and the people that grow to love the same passion that the designer had in mind.
Anyway looking forward to reading how others compare there cars. Keep in mind its listening?
 
Last edited:
Chassis: Both cars have stiff chassis. The FD seems to be a little stiffer. The FD is a lighter chassis and does with less expensive steel. Advantage FD.]
I don't know if there are figures published for chassis rigidity, but I think you mistakenly flip-flopped your assessment of the respective cars; maybe confusing the actual stiffness of the suspension vs. the chassis? If there's a real disadvantage performance-wise in the 2 cars it would have to be in the RX-7's stiffness of its structure, IMO. Thinking back and comparing when I actually drove new car vs new car in early 90s, the ride quality/solidity of the chassis gave the NSX an easy win over the FD; it just felt more "supple" and better tuned to absorb road irregularities. The quality put into it was much more evident than the half as costly Mazda offering.

It's that one area where the 3rd gen 7 severely lacked that, if it had equaled the NSX in bending and torsional rigidity one could have proclaimed the 7 as the best all around sportscar. Instead, the NSX held on to that title.

Still, the mighty RX-7 is no slouch handling and cornering-wise as many track-goers can attest to.
 
NSX = Sound,Cred,Handling,Beauty,Craftsmanship and Honda reliability , Smooth linear power , and the Wife doesnt hate it as much as the Z .

Z32 = Scary POWER!!! albiet laggy , ease upgrades and parts Umm thats about it. I do miss my Z somewhat though , Love/hate relationship :frown:

DSCF0386.jpg

DSCF0376.jpg
 
1986 Black/Black 928S because I could get all three kids in with me. God, I loved that car! until I saw the NSX! I saw an add in the Wall Street Journal of the NSX as the Polar Opposite of the Minivan, any body remember that ad? kind of negative impression for me. But, I knew I would get one one day. Well, with the kids, I went Minivan and SUV until last month when I bought my 2003 Yellow/Yellow NSX-T. I've been reading the NSX Prime for months... and what a fabulous site and community! funny thing is that I was never a car guy until NOW! The NSX is unbelievable! I'll post a new car owner thread one of these days if I can figure out how to include the pictures. I am going to need a lot of help. But one thing is sure, I can't wait to drive it tomorrow and I am driving all over the place (even without MP3 and Navigation) as long as I don't have to park it anywhere for very long. That caddy commercial is so true, When you turn your car on, does it return your favor?:biggrin:
 
9214_.jpg

The NSX and the SL 320 are the DD's for the most part.
The X rules in every thing but room to carry more people. But then again, we can never bring any of my cars when I need to bring the Fam. (LOL, thats what the wifes E320 is for anyhow!!!)
OK, OK, The Porsche 928 S RULES in the sound department. I have 1 chamber racing muffs w/o Cats. Coming from that 32V V8 and the 5sp, the sound is intoxicating!(If only the X could sound like that).
Jag XK8 is actually more comfy and of course faster but the damn Benz all Blacked out with the hardtop on and rolling on the AMG 18's is a sight to behold.
Lotus is cool, but the shifter is a nightmare, zero vision out of rearview mirror, always worried about what will break on this particular trip, racking up miles, bugs/chips, etc.... keeps me from enjoying this car nearly as much as the X.
Can't comment on the Evo cuz I bought it needed TLC, and it has not gotten it yet due to the massive funds being put in the NSX lately.
Fiero Indy is a show piece therefore I have only put 100 miles on it in 2 yrs.
85 Fiero GT is cool and gets a ton of attention but hard to justify actually driving it since I bought the NSX a lil over a yr ago.
I don't drive either Allante cuz they drive like crap IMO, but I think they look like "art" sitting in my garage, so I have kept them. Even now tho they have been pushed outside due to lack of room. (anybody want to buy an Allante? or 2?)
I may have forgotten a couple but damn, my fingers are cramping.
 
While my pics. are in the attic somewhere, my 1987 Grand National was probably as fun to drive as the NSX. While it decently modified it would run 12.50's all day on pump gas in drive alone. Though the mid 80's were'nt GM's best years, the GN was a relatively decent car.
 
You have a very fine collection, but whats a Viper doing in the mix? :tongue:

I truly understand your comment about the viper in the mix. I think Vipers get a bad rap, its truly alot of power for the adverage person, But I have had ten years in a race car and can tell you with the proper tire and a driver that can drive from his butt, its a fun and great handling car. I felt as you did the first few years thay came out but now that I have taken the time to LEARN how to drive one its proven me very wronge.
I also have a 2002 which has gotten all the changes and updates that the early years did not have so I am sure that is part of the reason why I enjoy it so much.
 

Lotus is cool, but the shifter is a nightmare, zero vision out of rearview mirror, always worried about what will break on this particular trip[/QUOTE]

Are the pedals still small and close together in the V8's? I enjoyed my 84 Turbo, but I hated the rattletrap shift linkage and the tiny footwell. I wear a size 12 and quickly figured out the Esprits were not made for people with shoe sizes in the double digits. :rolleyes:

That car was a blast to drive though. Until I bought my NSX, it was the most neutral handling car I'd ever owned. Got 'er up to 140 on a straightaway once, and it still had some left, which isn't bad for a 4-banger. Felt very stable at speed.
 

Attachments

  • esprit2 small.jpg
    esprit2 small.jpg
    60.9 KB · Views: 59
I enjoy the 94 Emerald Twin Turbo Z. She's got lots of power for a stock T.T. Has a lot of torque and no turbo lag. I think it will take my NSX on the straights, believe it or not. It does weigh quite a bit though and has a lot of body roll. For some reason, it does not drive as easy as my NSX. The TT takes a lot of my energy while driving it. My NSX I can drive all day, everyday and not be tired of it.

IMGP0342.jpg
 
I would not be able to sleep if my cars are that far from my bed.
NIce pic,
 
9214_.jpg

The NSX and the SL 320 are the DD's for the most part.
The X rules in every thing but room to carry more people. But then again, we can never bring any of my cars when I need to bring the Fam. (LOL, thats what the wifes E320 is for anyhow!!!)

Wow, everything is circa correct (perfect?), less the Jag and Evo. Congrats and more pics please? Nostalgia > Cars with voice navigation and MP3 players :smile:

But I have had ten years in a race car and can tell you with the proper tire and a driver that can drive from his butt, its a fun and great handling car. I felt as you did the first few years thay came out but now that I have taken the time to LEARN how to drive one its proven me very wronge.

I digress as was too quick to make a judgment; especially since my last two vehicles, one was made of plastic (350z) and the latter was consider to be the official Home Depot., I need to borrow it to haul (insert anything of lesser value here) vehicle. Must be fun to own cars of such different characters :)


LOL, I remember this poster from my 5th grade class room. It was hung on the wall right by the entrance. Always wondered why anyone would be so avaricious. Gosh, I was sooooo innocent then. :biggrin:
 
LOL, I remember this poster from my 5th grade class room. It was hung on the wall right by the entrance. Always wondered why anyone would be so avaricious. Gosh, I was sooooo innocent then. :biggrin:

Dang. I sure wasn't using words like avaricious in 5th grade. All l was really concerned about was boobs. Oh wait. Nothing's changed.
 
Back
Top