Reply to thread

I find this whole argument of people kill people and guns don't kill people ridiculous. What kills a person is another person, with a gun, with a bullet. All 3 of those had something to do with the other person dying.


Vegas is completely correct and logical in his statement. A nut will always try to kill, but having a knife or a gun or an ak47 makes all the difference in the world. What if I want to keep a tank in my garage? That ok? How about a nuclear bomb? That ok? That fall under my right to bear arms? Where are you going to draw the line? Right now any moron, any retard, anyone that isn't in jail already can get their hands on some crazy weaponry. This argument has now changed from should you own a weapon at all, to "well what kind should you own and who should you allow to own."


Just like I've always said in all my threads it comes down to money. Money money money. Gun rules don't benefit the gun seller. And he is more than happy to sit down with marketing people and come up with cute things like "guns don't kill people, people kill people" or even more poetic "if guns were outlawed, only outlaws will have guns". That's a good one. Seems to make so much sense...


Back
Top