In order to induce compression, and increase volumetric efficiency, you would need much higher intake velocity than you're going to get on a road car, it's more of a design consideration for aircraft, and even then it won't be relevant to all aircraft; ram-air is a marketing term from the 1970's, - really all it results in is additional debris clogging your air filter.
Engine designers will tune their intake system (airbox, manifold, etc.) for resonance, which can increase volumetric efficiency, which is why a factory airbox typically results in the highest level of power on a properly designed motor. Now in terms of design Honda wasn't trying to create only power, they were also trying to abide by noise limits, and they had emissions concerns to contend with, so there is a degree of uncertainty in the factory design.
There is also device called a factory intake resonator, which people remove in favor of a 'ram air' scoop / AIS - the scoop will not do anything except clog your filter, but the question is: does the factory resonator play a part in the tuning of the intake system. If it does, it would be foolish to remove this part.
There are several elements of charlatanism in intake design, they typically involve the terms "ram air" or "intake turbulance" - many designs also include velocity stacks or turbonators. In terms of the best solution for your car, my suggestion is a factory airbox, a more permeable filter element (comptech unifilter), and regular service, to ensure your filter does not become dirty.
If you wish to increase the 'sucking noise' you can remove the factory resonator tube from the quarter panel.