schuey1010 said:
Keep Long Beach, and maybe Toronto, and dump all those other street courses. As you stated, there is no passing, attendance is subpar at best, and the racing STINKS.
"Fun but for whom." Only the fans who sit around all day and drink themselves silly at the local bars around the circuit. Those people need to stick to NASCAR. Sorry if I offended any fans who enjoy NASCAR and miller lite. :biggrin: :biggrin:
Apology accepted.
I was at the race in Houston on Saturday, and it was very competetive. You just have to look at the nich they are filling. Here is a road racing series that is bringing the sport to places where they might develop a new fan base.
You want all road courses with only 1 or 2 street courses- There is a series for that, and it is called F1. The thing is, not everyone is willing to travel halfway across the nation to experience the 2 North American F1 appearences.
The race in Houston WAS entertaining- the festival atmosphere was less about snow cones, and Volleyball and more about open paddocks- you could pick your way between the Atlantic, ALMS, and Champ car pits, and get up really close to the machines. It was impressive.
I wonder just how fast your pure motorsport series would die a financial death. Money makes Motorsport go round, and sponsors are the money. Sponsors want to be seen, and city streets venues that attract a more diverse crowd will accomplish that.
The racing STINKS?!?!?
The track was challenging. Smooth, no, but challenging yes. The racing was competetive- and combative. Anyone sitting in the grandstands between turn 5 and 6 were treated to Mario Dominguez's run at Bourdais- he went for the pass button on the short straight between 5 and 6 and literally threw his car into the inside of Bourdais going into turn 6- the sheer velocity of the move was one of the ballsiest pass attempts I have ever seen in motorsport. I watched F1 on Sunday- there were no such spectacles.
Yes, we live in the land of NASCAR- and you know what? It is racing too. Maybe you turn your nose up at it, but it is still a multi-billion dollar jaugernaut of a series. The reason? Because you can see all of the action from your seat. NASCAR drivers are just doing what Indy drivers do, only they do it without the benefit of massive downforce producing wings, and steam-roller sized rubber to hold them in place.
They also pass more often than any other form of motorsport, so they are constantly in red zone proximity. It is white knuckle to say the least, and my hat is off to them.
If you don't appreciate it- don't watch. It isn't killing you that the races are happening somewhere. Is it?
I ask you this- when we live in such a motorsport challenged country as the U.S. why criticize what little homegrown racing we actually have? Do you think eliminating the series, or homogenizing it into minor-league F1 will draw more fans, sponsors, and events? Do you think it will create more sponsorship opportunites to grow and develop new racing series to watch and enjoy?
I think making it a road course based series would alienate the masses, and pander to the snobs who can't enjoy anything that isn't refined enough for their consumption. But then I guess those snobs probably would have turned up their nose at the ONE (1) beer this NASCAR/ Champ Car fan consumed under a hot Texas sun. after all it was a
Budweiser Can you
imagine???
It burns my ass to read your criticizim of the only motorsport we have, but I can testify that no one in my area of the bleachers appeared to be intoxicated even though they were obviously enjoying the racing. You can tell when people are applauding and pumping their fists at the cars as they scream by- people were having fun, even though they were so tightly crowded in their seats (Subpar attendance?)
Sorry you disagree.
Your loss not mine.
Philip