Wow. How could these guys get it so wrong? I was looking for something else on the web and ran across this:
http://www.caranddriver.com/features/supercar-supermarket-feature-acura-nsx-page-2
In 2001 they were predicting things like the following regarding the upcoming "second generation NSX" to debut in 2002...
"The new model will be powered by a version of the 3.5-liter DOHC 40-valve V-8...expected to give the new NSX 200-mph capability....[The new NSX is] expected to be dimensionally similar to the current car and also to reflect the car's significantly higher performance aspirations. Also significantly higher will be the price -- about $143,000."
At least they got the performance and price close to correct...Just 14 years early.
Love the pic, though. Take a 2001 model, lower the side vents, graft on an S2000 front end and, voila, a second gen NSX. Actually I think the front end treatment suits the rest of the car rather well but I guess the extra retooling would have been too expensive. Or maybe nobody at Honda reads Car and Driver.
http://www.caranddriver.com/features/supercar-supermarket-feature-acura-nsx-page-2
In 2001 they were predicting things like the following regarding the upcoming "second generation NSX" to debut in 2002...
"The new model will be powered by a version of the 3.5-liter DOHC 40-valve V-8...expected to give the new NSX 200-mph capability....[The new NSX is] expected to be dimensionally similar to the current car and also to reflect the car's significantly higher performance aspirations. Also significantly higher will be the price -- about $143,000."
At least they got the performance and price close to correct...Just 14 years early.
Love the pic, though. Take a 2001 model, lower the side vents, graft on an S2000 front end and, voila, a second gen NSX. Actually I think the front end treatment suits the rest of the car rather well but I guess the extra retooling would have been too expensive. Or maybe nobody at Honda reads Car and Driver.
Last edited: