Are Aston Martins reliable?

Joined
19 July 2004
Messages
505
Location
New York City/Honolulu
I've been browsing through Autotrader and cars.com and have stumbled upon some pretty tempting DB7's going for under $60,000. Since that price is around the same as a new M3, I was just wondering if any of you have had any experiences with these cars in terms of ownership costs as well as maintanance and reliability.
 
Ive often wondered this as well. I check some of the threads on Ferrarichat.com for some more insight. Id imagine it too be a maintence nightmere.
 
the db9 looks so much better, but $$$.

I was considering the db7 at one time. Hmmm...I would get the BMW 355i Hardtop Convertible.

My 2 Cents.
 
google turned up:

http://www.carsurvey.org/model_Aston+Martin_DB7.html
http://www.carreview.com/cat/automobiles/sports-cars/aston-martin/PRD_140_1528crx.aspx

best quote:
"Drinks gas like I drink vodka"


also, from: http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/carreviews/usedcartests/49871/aston_martin_db7.html

You wouldn't believe it, but you can now buy an Aston Martin for the price of a Ford Mondeo. The exotic machine is stunning to look at, yet second-hand the amazing DB7 is as affordable as many family cars, and comes with far more street cred.
With acceptable, although not cheap, running costs, plus the prospect of pretending to be James Bond without the associated risk, few models at this price have so much all-round appeal. Launched back in 1994, the DB7 secured Aston's future after years of unrest. More than 4,000 six-cylinder cars were sold - a company record.
Flushed with success, the firm added the lithe Volante cabrio in 1996. Then, in 1999, the original supercharged 3.2-litre engine was joined by a staggering 420bhp 6.0-litre V12. Despite the extra cost (from ΂£92,500), it quickly superseded its smaller sibling, selling well right up to its discontinuation in 2003.
Checklist

* Engine: Jaguar-derived 3.2-litre engine is very tough, as is the later 6.0 V12. Even the 3.2's three-year supercharger belt-renewal stipulation is affordable.

* Brakes: Hard-worked discs are susceptible to warping, revealed by a judder under braking. Source new parts from specialists rather than dealers; you'll pay around £75.

* Suspension: Tyres are sensitive to pressures, and wear rapidly if incorrect. Look for problem signs on the inside edge, which indicate mis-aligned suspension geometry.

* Interior: The cabin is cheapened by Ford-derived switchgear, but at least it's reliable. Ensure the air-con works, though, as the dash-out repair can cost more than £3,000.

* Reliability: Early cars did suffer annoying niggles, but these were all cured over time. Our best advice? Buy as late as you can possibly afford, even if it means choosing a higher-mileage example.

Driving Impressions
Even the 3.2-litre DB7 has ample performance, but the V12 is truly stunning. Many prefer the automatic box to the heavy manual, yet the handling inspires confidence and suits British roads, while the ride is brilliant for a sporting model.
There's reasonable room for two inside (forget the token rear 'seats', though) and the trim is plush, but the classy dash is spoiled by cheap Nineties' Ford switchgear. Look out instead; the view over the bonnet is sublime.
Glass's View
Continuing Aston Martin's heritage for building beautiful cars, the DB7 has seen an increase in interest following the launch of the DB9, thanks to a two-year waiting list for the newcomer. Manuals and autos are worth the same, while Volante cabriolets are seasonal and not as good to drive as the coupé. Most buyers in this sector also hanker after an electric roof rather than the Aston's manual-only unit, so the initial high cost new isn't reflected on the used market. Jeff Paterson, senior editor, Glass's Guide
Life With A DB7
The Aston Martin DB7 is absolutely fantastic, and one of the most exciting cars I have ever owned. But sometimes I would like more room in the cabin. Shane Thresher, Stoke Bishop, Bristol
Fast and good to look at, the DB7 is a really great machine considering the comparatively low price it was purchased for. I just wish it was a little cheaper to fill the tank with petrol! S Tejani, Chelmsley Wood, West Midlands


car_photo_16418_5.jpg
 
Nope they are not reliabel.

At top gear they got a one for a test drive (NEW) and it broke down when they tried to start it!

There expensive to run but are nice cars (the seats are quite nice just as the trim) these days there quite a lot of them on the road (DB9)
 
I have heard many good things including the reliablility of Aston since they created the DB7. Yes, they are pretty reliable. I say go for it based on the things I have heard over the years.
 
Beautiful cars, but they are Englisch made...need one say more?:rolleyes:
 
Here we go again:tongue:

The term "Reliable" has different definitions depending on who you talk to.

Ask a Toyota owner what "Reliable" is, they would say "everything on the car works all the time"

Ask a Renault owner and they would say "It doesn't leave me stranded very often"


You have to decide what "Reliable" means for you.
 
Here we go again:tongue:

The term "Reliable" has different definitions depending on who you talk to.

Ask a Toyota owner what "Reliable" is, they would say "everything on the car works all the time"

Ask a Renault owner and they would say "It doesn't leave me stranded very often"


You have to decide what "Reliable" means for you.

This is very true.
 
Given that this is an NSX forum, I think we should all agree that when using the term reliable here, we should be comparing it to NSX reliability :).
 
:tongue: :tongue: :tongue: :tongue:
This makes me think back of a birthday party that I visited about 15 years ago:
Someone there was telling how happy he was his Lada; every time he got stranded with a mechanical failure (I understood it happend to him at least 3 times over the last few months), the Garage would pick him and the car up within an hour or so, would bring him home and have the Lada repaired within a few days at most..............great service, his next car would surely be a Lada again...............I just kept silent with amazement:eek: :redface: :rolleyes: :biggrin:
 
Here we go again:tongue:

The term "Reliable" has different definitions depending on who you talk to.

Ask a Toyota owner what "Reliable" is, they would say "everything on the car works all the time"

Ask a Renault owner and they would say "It doesn't leave me stranded very often"


You have to decide what "Reliable" means for you.


Right you are....... From having owned 3 British cars since I started driving I think I have the right to chime in here. Reliable really means "how much are you willing to put up with?" If you don't mind a few days of down time for routine maintenance/repairs every few months then you're good to go. I hate people who try to compare cars like the DB7, Rolls, Bentley, etc... to the flagship models of Lexus, which are basically souped up Avalon's, 4 runners, and Solara coupes. Of course those are going to be more reliable.... The AM is a different experience altogether...... Back to our main topic though, a V6 DB7 is a very reliable car. It's built off of the XK8, which itself is a pretty good car... Some of the earlier models suffered from various engine issues (nikasil wear, cracking chain tensioners, bad TB's), but the DB7 used a V6 and not the same V8 in the Jag. The V6 is rock solid. I would only buy manual of course as I heard that the auto's break "occasionally" and are expensive to fix.

Used DB7's are cheap as was stated earlier. 00's - 03's (the V12) can be bought for under $80k now with super low miles, even under $60k for an 00. The earlier V6's can be bought for under $60k now........

I'd trade in my NSX for an early model DB7, or later year Silver Spur or Brooklands.
 
Why would you say "Of course those are going to be more reliable....". As far as I'm concerned there is absolutely NO reason for any car not to be as reliable as a Honda or Toyota. The only reason some other car isn't as reliable is because corners were cut or the manufacturers/auto workers were sloppy.
 
One of my associates had a DB-7 Convertible, he hated it, it was a pig, and the rattles drove him crazy, car was so slow that he couldn't wait to get out of it. He took a bath on the resale
 
Look up some forums and figure out the expected maint. costs annually. That's the best way to tell and take the bias out of it. Most people with MB S600 W140 sedans will tell you around 10kUSD a year. To me, that's high maint. I have almost bought 3 different jag's but for one reason or another couldn't pull the trigger.

I would assume driving the DB7 regularly, say at least 5k miles a year, would result in a fairly hefty maint. bill. Perhaps the car doesn't break down on you, but if the rear struts start leaking and your gauge cluster begins to flicker, it may cost 5k+ to fix it. It's just a matter of figuring out how much per year it's going to cost to keep the car going in the condition you want in the context of what you are going to use it for.

In relation to other British cars of the time, I have also heard the 6 cylinder model especially is fairly durable, but I have no idea what that really means coming from Jag owners who's cars depreciate 50% in 4 years or less.
 
Back
Top