These cars really are enormously different in every way.
Vipers do make insane power, even stock, but traction is a real bottleneck. It's not very useful if you're spinning the wheels all through first (unless the goal is to spin the wheels
)
I test drove a bunch of Vipers before coming back to the NSX including a 2000 ACR, a 2002 RT/10, a 2001 GTS and a 2006 SRT-10
They were all fast, brutal and gigantic. The car feels bigger than the Vette (I owned a C5 back in 2000 before my first NSX) and it isnt very comfortable (the SRT being better than the Gen 2)
The clutch and shifter are heavy and the visibility is odd, but the seats are pretty good. Fit and finish was so so.
They ARE pretty well built though, and are reliable and cheap to fix. Its not a car I would want to drive often, but its a car Im glad some of my friends own.
Coming back to the NSX I came back to a heavily modded 1999 with CTSC. It's down at around 3000 lbs and making about 350HP at the wheels. In car video has me doing 0-60 in about 4.2 seconds and I suck completely (really soft start and I am *not* a great "drag stip" 6 speed driver)
For me... thats quick enough... LOL... I also find that there is power ALL OVER the band with the SC.
COULD I go quicker in an SRT-10? If I got a lot better at shifting and had no traction issues, the SRT-10 technically can be quicker to 60 than a SC 3.2L by maybe a couple of tenths. Is that likely to matter? 3.8 0-60 vs 4.0 0-60 when 99% of the cars on the road are 9 seconds 0-60? Only you can answer that one.
Who the hell is referring to *any* FI NSX as "anemic"?!?! NO ONE I know outside of the NSX community does. They refer to the 3.0L STOCK NSX as "anemic". But *any* FI is a whole different ballgame obviously. The NSX is a light car. FI in ANY form takes it easily to around 400HP. This is C5 Z06 territory. Last I checked 400HP in a 3000lb car isnt "anemic" in *any* book. You can only utilize so much HP on ANY road given that you have to turn or stop at some point.