dgp said:
I think they claim 0-60 in 3.9 seconds and top speed of 150mph with the ZZR12 engine.
Sounds realistic because with the ZX 11 engine the Rex was doing, stock, exactly 4,1 s and top speed of 225 km/h ( 140 mph ).
dgp said:
The 1200cc has more or less the same hp as the ZX11 but a more broad torque range.
This is even better! I didn't have the feeling that it suffered from lack of torque à la S2000, mainly due to its lightness: only 900 lbs.
Just imagine what a Rex would do with an NSX engine!!!
dgp said:
You can also add a windshield which increases top end and lowers cd.
Interesting! Are you sure about these facts? Because adding a windshield will also add frontal area of car which is also responsible of diminishing top speed.
So if you are right, decreasing of cd would thus be higher than increasing of frontal area.
This will be another interesting upgrade to do...
dgp said:
I think adding a windshield wouldn't classify it as a bike anymore and so you might need to have wipers added as well (i think there's a law which says any vehicle with a windshield must also have wipers).
There is more IMO than a mere windshield difference between a car and a bike. Check your local regulation. Here in the province of Québec this wouldn't be sufficient.
There was several reasons why Mr. Campagna chose the three wheeled route over to four one. Efficiency and minimal weight but also to lower development costs as car regulations are more restrictive, complex and very expensive.
Just think to numerous prototypes to be lost in various collision tests...
dgp said:
What I meant when i said living with the car every day was about reliability. Obviously you don't buy a car like this to drive it everyday.
Oh! On this side it is very good because reliability is as good as with the bike.
You must regularly inspect the front suspension and be aware if suspension ball joint needs to be lubricated. Not because you will have to constanly think about it but because you will not want a single issue with that.
Driving it every day could be possible. Surprisingly, in rainy days, you will experience that rain drops are fairly well deflected.
dgp said:
Who services the car? Do you know if a motorcycle service shop can service it? How about warranty work?
Should be your T Rex dealer for every thing except engine, otherwise he will probably refer to a Kawasaki dealer.
dgp said:
I
Unfortunately there is no turbo kit for the ZZR12 engine, i think there might be one for the zx11 powered t-rex's. Do you know any braking statistics for the t-rex or acceleration #'s at higher speeds (0-100mph, 1/4 mile etc)? The skidpad #'s sound unbelievable. I don't know of anything that can match it except for race cars!
Do you plan to get a T-Rex soon?
I know there is a turbo kit for the ZX 11 engine.
About braking statistics I never made scientifical measurements about them, but believe me, I would bet it is better than my NSX. I would go for something well under 32 metres from 100 km/h to 0.
Read: less than a 100 ft from 60 mph to zero!!!
Handling is where this thing really shines, on a track you can really hang with 911 TT ( as far as there is lots of twisties and not too much long straits... ).
Acceleration numbers at higher speeds are IMO deceptive because when you reach the 100 mph mark it is becoming breathless. You understand now why I want a turbo upgrade!
Don't remember quarter mile numbers but I would go for easy sub 13 s... I'll find it...
Skidpad numbers are also realistics because:
1- It is typically the same kind of numbers than Formula race cars having such a low COW and suspension design and also having NO aerodynamical downforce system! IOW you have a car that shows almost a perfect mechanical grip efficiency.
You find these numbers unreal? Adding aerodynamical grip to the package and you will enter into the 3-4 g realm...
Now we are talking about my dream T-Rex: over 300 hp with downforce goodies!
2- The cornering speed difference between a car having a lateral acceleration number of g1 and another having a lateral acceleration number of g2 is only square root of g1 / g2.
So, a car capable of 2g is only going 1,41 times faster than another capable of 1g. Not the two time faster that most people would intuitively and wrongly think.
Now you can smile when somebody says his car do 1,02g compared to yours at 0,99g !
( Z06 vs Zanardi maybe
)
Last detail about skidpad numbers: A car doing 2 g on a X hundred feet skidpad will not necessarily show the same numbers on a Y hundred feet skidpad. So it doesn't give the whole picture of its overall handling.
Best example: nobody would doubt about the Mc Laren F1 first class handling and performances, about its extraordinary ability to reach unreal speeds in bends but when you look at its skidpad number @ 200 ft it shows only...0,86g !!!
About getting a T-Rex soon, I will look for a used one with the
ZX 11 engine and turbo it. I don't believe any more in purchasing brand new. Almost never worth the difference when you buy high end stuff. Later I could swap for the newer engine!
By next summer I'd like to find a nice one.
Sorry for this long post.
Carguy!, they sell for around 35K$ US.
Cheers guys!
Dgp, if you like to drive you can't go wrong with a T-Rex, but as for the NSX, a T-Rex isn't a drag car, it is a pure race car. In fact the nearest of a formula race car with only mechanical grip you can "road legally" get.