"Torquey?"Acura NSX details emerge... said:Autoweek: Can you say anything about power output?
Ted Klaus, Large Project Leader of the NSX: “The first NSX was torquey, with a broad power band and it was responsive. The key is to have mid-range torque. It's going to have a high-specific power output per liter.”
-
Has anyone asked the question and received an answer about targeted production numbers ?
<small></small> |
Lacking soul and character? C'mon...
I think they meant to say that the 1st gen NSX's were comfortable, reliable and without the eccentricities of the F cars and such
....Has anyone asked the question and received an answer about targeted production numbers ?
Maximum production target of 8 per day.
Nice share, thanks!
Here's more of the interview: http://www.autoguide.com/auto-news/...ffordable-ferrari-fighter-chief-engineer.html
This below had me chuckle a bit...
"Torquey?"
May be revvy? peppy? anxsy? Torquey doesn't come to mind!
If anyone has seen Chris Harris drive/review the Porsche 918 Spyder, you know what to expect with the NSX (except it won't be as good as the 918). In sum, he liked a lot about it, and took a while to learn how to drive it; but in the end, he thought all the tech compromised the car.
So we want to compare a car that is reportedly over 800k to one that will be between 90k-180k ? ok
Saying they cannot out-muslce a corvette worries me a lot. With 3 electric motors and a v6, you better be able to do better than a C7 with 1 engine using push-rod technology. -- otherwise what is the point? -- hell, the pushrod will STILL probably get better gas mileage.
If the NSX in 1997 had gone to a 3.5L 350HP engine instead of 3.2 L 290, a lot more people would have paid it attention. Hope they don't make the mistake of yet another underpowered supercar.
I am certain it will be much faster than a standard C7 in a straight line, and probably close to or faster than a Z something version. It will guaranteed feel better, respond better, and be faster around turns by a pretty good shot. Most cars are using old technology for cornering. I think the is where the NSX will shine. We've already seen the GTR do outstanding at corner exit speeds, just using technology. There is still more to be had. I will bet the new NSX will set standards in terms of handling. Super light weight, individual vectoring of each wheel, instant torque, low center of gravity, short wheelbase... can't you see? the ingredients are all there Dave. This thing is going to shoot into corners, grip like nothing else and fly out of the corner so fast it's going to eat lesser cars for lunch. Really, good luck to other cars trying to keep up with the NSX in corners. Even a mighty GTR will fall, too much weight, too high a center, too big. The NSX is going to be a small fast Ninja. It's going to slice you in half before you've said hello.
I am certain it will be much faster than a standard C7 in a straight line, and probably close to or faster than a Z something version. It will guaranteed feel better, respond better, and be faster around turns by a pretty good shot. Most cars are using old technology for cornering. I think the is where the NSX will shine. We've already seen the GTR do outstanding at corner exit speeds, just using technology. There is still more to be had. I will bet the new NSX will set standards in terms of handling. Super light weight, individual vectoring of each wheel, instant torque, low center of gravity, mid-engine, short wheelbase... can't you see? the ingredients are all there Dave. This thing is going to shoot into corners, grip like nothing else and fly out of the corner so fast it's going to eat lesser cars for lunch. Really, good luck to other cars trying to keep up with the NSX in corners. Even a mighty GTR will fall, too much weight, too high a center, too big. The NSX is going to be a small fast Ninja. It's going to slice you in half before you've said hello.