I've been meaning to ask this now for years. All car mags list 0-60 and 5-60 times. I can't understand why universally 5-60 is ALWAYS slower than 0-60. That makes absolutely no sense to me.
I've been meaning to ask this now for years. All car mags list 0-60 and 5-60 times. I can't understand why universally 5-60 is ALWAYS slower than 0-60. That makes absolutely no sense to me.
It should depend on the car. It's traction, it's torque, etc.
Something like an STi, or EVO has much more traction than power. They can redline it and drop the clutch and LAUNCH the car.
Something like an Integra Type-R has no torque or traction, and therefore it's 5-60 should be quicker than it's 0-60.
What about rolling at 5mph and dropping the clutch like a regular launch? Wouldn't that help?
Yeah, but that's not how they test 5-60 or any other rolling acceleration tests. That's the point of them: to test how much passing power you have while already rolling, in gear without a clutch-drop.
Amen to that. My S2000 is a dog from a 5mph punch. Sure, it'll beat a Civic (barely) but there are quite a few cars that are quicker from a 5mph punch. You'd be surprised how close a Civic is from that kind of a race...