I'm going to court tomorrow to fight a traffic ticket and I'm looking for some advice.
I was written up for 88 in a 65. Since it was more than 20 over, I believe the penalties are worse. (is this correct?) At the arraignment hearing the judge said if I pled guilty, i would lose my license for 30 days, which seemed really extreme, so pled not-guilty.
The officer said I was going over 90 and wrote me up for 88. I had looked at my speedo several times and I'm certain I wasn't going much over 80. 82 at the most. Which is only 15mph over, not 20. The officer never told me how he determined my speed. My V1 never went off, so I don't think it was a radar ticket. When I first saw the officer, he was about 1/4 mile behind and I immediately slowed down, so he must have been pretty far away, so I don't see how he could have accurately determined my speed. Of course, using this as a defence admits that I was over 65 (though I was nowhere near 88.)
Would it be wrong to admit that I was going 80, but no faster? Or does that just make me guilty and I get the full sentence? I'm willing to get a normal speeding ticket fine, but I don't want to get shafted with 20mph over penalties, such as extra points or losing my license.
Any advice would be appreciated. Sorry for posting at the last minute. I'm used to "studying" the night before my exams.
------------------
Tim Meekins
1997 Yellow NSX-T
http://tmeekins.com
I was written up for 88 in a 65. Since it was more than 20 over, I believe the penalties are worse. (is this correct?) At the arraignment hearing the judge said if I pled guilty, i would lose my license for 30 days, which seemed really extreme, so pled not-guilty.
The officer said I was going over 90 and wrote me up for 88. I had looked at my speedo several times and I'm certain I wasn't going much over 80. 82 at the most. Which is only 15mph over, not 20. The officer never told me how he determined my speed. My V1 never went off, so I don't think it was a radar ticket. When I first saw the officer, he was about 1/4 mile behind and I immediately slowed down, so he must have been pretty far away, so I don't see how he could have accurately determined my speed. Of course, using this as a defence admits that I was over 65 (though I was nowhere near 88.)
Would it be wrong to admit that I was going 80, but no faster? Or does that just make me guilty and I get the full sentence? I'm willing to get a normal speeding ticket fine, but I don't want to get shafted with 20mph over penalties, such as extra points or losing my license.
Any advice would be appreciated. Sorry for posting at the last minute. I'm used to "studying" the night before my exams.
------------------
Tim Meekins
1997 Yellow NSX-T
http://tmeekins.com